1.
The submitters conducted this procedure under an atmosphere of argon; the checkers found substitution of nitrogen to have no adverse impact on yield or purity.
2.
Benzyl alcohol (99%), 2-chloropyridine (99%), and 18-crown-6 (99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification.
3.
Potassium hydroxide pellets were purchased from J. T. Baker and ground with a mortar and pestle immediately before use.
4.
The submitters purchased toluene from VWR and passed it through neutral alumina and 4Å molecular sieves columns under argon atmosphere before use. The checkers obtained ACS grade toluene from Sigma-Aldrich and used it as received.
5.
The checkers utilized a heating mantle and a solid state heating controller set to 125 °C at approximately 80% power to maintain reflux. The submitters utilized an oil bath (150 °C bath temperature).
6.
At the end of the reaction, 1.4 mL of water was collected in the Dean-Stark trap.
7.
The checkers performed a simple distillation under vacuum with the distillation pot heated in an oil bath set at 120 °C. The submitters employed fractional vacuum distillation using a short-path distillation apparatus fitted with a 3-neck pig adapter and thermometer and connected to a vacuum oil pump (0.25 mmHg).
8.
The compound had the following physical data: bp: 93–95 °C/ 1.0 mmHg. IR (thin film): 1594, 1569, 1472, 1430, 1270, 988, 777, 733, 695 cm−1. 1H NMR pdf (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 5.36 (s, 2 H), 6.80 (dt, J = 8.4, 0.9 Hz, 1 H), 6.87 (ddd, J = 7.1, 5.1, 0.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.30 (m, 1 H), 7.34–7.39 (m, 2 H), 7.44–7.49 (m, 2 H), 7.57 (ddd, J = 8.4, 7.1, 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.17 (ddd, J = 5.1, 2.0, 0.8 Hz, 1 H); 13C NMR pdf (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 67.5, 111.3, 116.9, 127.8, 127.9, 128.4, 137.3, 138.6, 146.8, 163.6; Anal: Calcd for C12H11NO: C, 77.81; H, 5.99; N, 7.56. Found: C, 77.56; H, 6.07; N, 7.32. Rf = 0.64 (250 μm silica gel on glass, hexanes:ethyl acetate = 3:1, UV visualization). The spectral data for 2-benzyloxypyridine matched that of the literature data.3
9.
The submitters used magnetic stirring for this reaction. The checkers observed that cooling of the thick slurry was much less efficient with magnetic stirring than with mechanical stirring at the scale of this preparation.
10.
Methyl trifluoromethanesulfonate (MeOTf) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, stored and handled under an atmosphere of argon, and used without further purification.
11.
TLC analysis showed disappearance of 2-benzyloxypyridine within 1 h by TLC (Rf (reaction product) = 0; Rf (starting material) = 0.6; 3:1 hexanes:EtOAc; UV visualization) and by HPLC (product tR 2.7 min; starting material tR 2.4 min; Agilent Zorbax SB-CN column, 4.2 × 75 mm, 3.5 μ silica; mobile phases 0.1% HClO4/H2O and acetonitrile; isocratic 95:5 aqueous:acetonitrile for 0.25 min, ramp to 10:90 over 5 min; isocratic at 10:90 for 0.75 min, flow 2 mL/min, UV detection at 210 nm, 30 °C column temperature).
12.
The checkers obtained ACS grade hexanes from Sigma-Aldrich and used it as received.
13.
Further purification of the material thus obtained was not necessary. The compound had the following physical data: mp: 92–93 °C. IR (thin film): 1639, 1587, 1518, 1254, 1148, 1028, 772, 751, 699, 633 cm−1. 1H NMR pdf (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 4.07 (s, 3 H), 5.54 (s, 2 H), 7.38–7.52 (m, 6 H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H), 8.31 (ddd, J = 1.8, 7.5, 9.2 Hz, 1 H), 8.47 (dd, J = 6.4, 1.5 Hz, 1 H); 13C NMR pdf (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 41.8, 74.3, 112.0, 119.0, 120.6 (q, JCF = 320 Hz), 128.5, 128.9, 129.5, 132.5, 143.7, 148.0, 159.4; 19F NMR pdf (376 MHz, CDCl3, external reference to TFA) δ: −78.8 (s); MS (APCI+) 200.2 (M-OTf)+. Anal: Calcd for C14H14F3NO4S: C, 48.14; H, 4.04; N, 4.01; Found: C, 48.27; H, 3.73; N, 3.95. The submitters also reported the following data: HRMS (ESI+) found 200.1070 (M-OTf)+ (calcd for C13H14NO+: 200.1075) CHFNOS analysis: Calcd for C14H14F3NO4S: C, 48.14%; H, 4.04%; F, 16.31%; N, 4.01%; O, 18.32%; S, 9.18%. Found: C, 48.24%; H, 4.09%; F, 16.27%; N, 4.10%; O, 18.53%; S, 9.31%.
14.
A minimum of 1.8 equiv of 2-benzyloxy-1-methylpyridinium trifluoromethanesulfonate was found to be necessary for complete consumption of the alcohol substrates. Dibenzyl ether (Bn2O) was formed as a by-product during the course of the reaction, perhaps through reaction of the pyridinium salt with MgO and/or adventitious moisture to generate benzyl alcohol in situ.
15.
The checkers obtained magnesium oxide (light) from Sigma-Aldrich and dried it in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 12 h. The submitters dried magnesium oxide under vacuum in a flask immersed in an oil bath for 6 h and stored under an atmosphere of argon.
16.
α,α,α-Trifluorotoluene in a Sure/Seal bottle was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification.
17.
Methyl (R)-(-)-3-hydroxy-2-methyl propanoate (99% ee) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification.
18.
The reaction mixture was analyzed by thin layer chromatography (TLC, 250 μm silica gel on glass, hexanes/ethyl acetate = 9:1); visualization was accomplished with 254 nm UV light and anisaldehyde stain with heating: Rf (starting alcohol) = 0.08; Rf (benzyl ether product) = 0.36; Rf (dibenzyl ether by-product) = 0.61.
19.
The checkers utilized 120 g of silica gel (60Å, 230–400 mesh) loading the sample neat and used a gradient (19:1 heptanes:EtOAc to elute Bn2O, to 9:1 heptanes:EtOAc to elute the desired product). The submitters utilized a silica gel column (16 cm length × 4.5 cm width, 90 g of Silica Gel 60 Geduran® 40–63 μM) wet-loaded as a slurry, loading the sample in a minimum volume of eluent, and eluting the product with 750 mL 19:1 hexanes:EtOAc.
20.
Careful analysis of the 1H NMR spectrum prior to chromatography and LC/MS analysis of the purified product indicated that impurities were formed from bis- and tris-benzylation (i.e. M+Bn and M+2Bn), presumably by addition to the aromatic ring of the primary benzyl ether product. These impurities seemed to have a greater response factor than the desired product, as their apparent level by LC/MS analysis was significantly higher than that indicated by 1H NMR or elemental analysis. For example, the elemental analysis in Note 21 corresponded to less than 5% of the bis-benzyl product (C19H22O3, vs. C12H16O3 for the desired), and the 1H NMR spectrum showed no discernable quantities of any impurity. This level of impurity should not be an issue for the vast majority of applications of this methodology, but the readers should be aware of the potential presence of these side products.
21.
The compound had the following physical data, which matched the data in the literature.4 1H NMR pdf (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ:1.16 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H), 2.79 (X of ABXY3, ddq, JBX = 5.9 Hz, JAX = 7.4 Hz, JXY = 7.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.47 (B of ABXY3, dd, JAB = 9.1 Hz, JBX = 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.64 (A of ABXY3, dd, JAB = 9.1 Hz, JAX = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.68 (s, 2H), 4.50 (B of AB, J = 12.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.51 (A of AB, J = 12.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.26–7.35 (m, 5 H); 13C NMR pdf (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ:13.9, 40.1, 51.7, 71.9, 73.0, 127.51, 127.53, 128.3, 138.1, 175.2; IR (thin film, cm−1): 1736, 1454, 1363, 1198, 1176, 1092, 1028, 736, 698, 608. Anal: Calc'd for C12H16O3: C, 69.21; H, 7.74. Found: C, 69.57; H, 7.86. [α]D −10.4° (c 2.8, CHCl3); lit [α]D −10.6° (c 1.7, CHCl3).5 Rf = 0.36 (250 μm silica gel on glass, hexanes/ethyl acetate = 9:1). Chiral HLPC analysis (Chiracal OD-H 0.46 × 25 cm, 98:2 heptane:2-propanol mobile phase at 1.5 mL/min flow) indicated >99% ee. The (R) enantiomer eluted at 3.88 min; the (S) enantiomer eluted at 4.17 min.