1. The checkers used phenylmagnesium bromide purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, 3.0 M in Et2O solution.
The submitters reported that the Grignard
reagent was prepared using the following procedure, which was not checked: A 500-mL, oven-dried three-necked round-bottomed flask (Note 2), is equipped
with a 4-cm oval Teflon-coated magnetic stir bar, a 125 mL pressure-equalizing addition funnel placed on the middle neck of the reaction flask, and a
reflux condenser fitted at the top with an in-line oil bubbler connected to an argon line. The third neck is fitted with a glass stopper. The flask is
purged with argon and an atmosphere of argon is maintained during the reaction. The flask is charged with dry magnesium turnings (6.1 g, 250 mmol, 5.0
equiv), and stirring is initiated to activate the magnesium surface. After stirring for 15 min, anhydrous Et2O (50 mL) (Note 5) is added via the
addition funnel. A solution of bromobenzene (39.3 g, 250 mmol, 5.0 equiv) (Note 3) in anhydrous Et2O (100 mL) was transferred into the addition
funnel and added dropwise. The clear reaction mixture becomes cloudy within 5 min, and soon thereafter begins to reflux and turns brown. The dropwise
addition is continued for 45 min, at a rate to sustain a gentle reflux. After completion of the addition, the residue is rinsed from the addition funnel
into the reaction flask with dry Et2O (10 mL). The reaction mixture is then heated for 0.5 h using a warm-water bath of 45-50 °C. At
this time, only a trace of magnesium metal is visible, and the solution has a dark brown, cloudy appearance. The flask is then removed from the warm-water
bath, and the reaction mixture is stirred at room temperature for an additional 0.5-1 h.
2. Glassware was oven-dried (110 °C) before use.
3. The checkers used the following reagents in step A as received: L-leucine methyl ester hydrochloride (Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., >98.0%). The
submitters used the following reagents in step A: L-leucine methyl ester hydrochloride (Alfa Aesar-Johnson Matthey Co., 99%)
4. The submitters recorded the following: To insure complete and clean conversion, L-leucine methyl ester hydrochloride (1) must be milled and/or
delumped to a fine powder using a pestle and mortar and dried under vacuum (<0.1 mmHg, 2 h, 50 °C) prior to use. The checkers used
commercial L-leucine methyl ester hydrochloride without pretreatment.
5. The checkers used anhydrous diethyl ether (Kanto Chemical Co., Inc., dehydrated, >99.5%), which was purified under argon by a solvent purifying unit
(Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.). The submitters used anhydrous diethyl ether (Acros, 99%) that was freshly distilled under argon from
Na/benzophenone.
6. Initially, the reaction is highly exothermic due to the Grignard reagent reacting with HCl resulting in the ether boiling. However, by slowly adding the
Grignard reagent to the cooled suspension of 1, this exotherm is easily controlled. The checkers added the Grignard reagent dropwise during 10 min.
When half amount of Grignard reagent was added, the temperature had increased to 25 °C from 5 °C. Subsequently, the temperature gradually
decreased to 17 °C.
7. The reaction is monitored by TLC; the checkers used the following analytical conditions. An aliquot (ca. 0.02 mL) is quenched by addition to saturated
NH4Cl (0.5 mL) and EtOAc (0.5 mL). The EtOAc layer was analyzed by TLC on silica gel with 1:9 MeOH/CH2Cl2 as eluent and
visualization with phosphomolybdic acid. The starting material and product have the following Rf values: 1 as a free amine (0.62); 2 (0.55) on Merck TLC Plate 60 F254.
8. The checkers noted that the addition of NH4Cl solution is initially violent. When the first 50 mL of NH4Cl solution was added
carefully, the mixture solidified and the internal temperature rose to 35 °C from 6 °C. After the mixture was cooled in an ice bath to stop the
boiling of diethyl ether, 100 mL of NH4Cl was added dropwise over 5 min and the mixture became a yellow slurry.
9. For workup in steps A and B and for recrystallization, the checkers used ethyl acetate (Kanto Chemical Co., Inc., >99.5%). The submitters used ethyl
acetate (tech. grade, BCD), which was distilled prior to use.
10. The submitters recorded the following: the addition of aqueous HCl can result in the formation of the 2•HCl salt, which is not
soluble in the two-phase mixture. After vigorous stirring at ca. pH 8, 2•HCl is converted to 2, resulting in
dissolution of the solid, and giving a clear two-phase mixture. If the aqueous phase is not sufficiently basic, 4 M NaOH was added to adjust the pH.
11. The pressure should be lowered gradually in order to prevent bumping, since a precipitate of 2 is formed during the concentration.
12. Pure (S)-2-amino-4-methyl-1,1-diphenylpentan-1-ol (2) can be obtained by recrystallization from EtOAc and has the following physical and
spectroscopic properties: colorless crystals; mp 134-137 °C; [a]D20-91.6 (c 1.00, CHCl3) lit.9: [a]D25 -96.6 (c 1.00, CHCl3)]; 1H NMR pdf(CDCl3,600 MHz) d: 0.87 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3 H), 0.89 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.06-1.11 (m, 1 H), 1.27 (ddd, J = 14.3, 10.4, 3.8 Hz, 1 H), 1.54-1.59 (m, 1
H), 2.31 (brs, 3 H), 3.98 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.14-7.19 (m, 2 H), 7.27 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.48
(d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.61 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR pdf(CDCl3, 150 MHz) d: 21.3, 24.0, 25.3, 39.4, 54.5, 79.1, 125.5,
125.8, 126.3, 126.6, 128.0, 128.4, 144.5, 147.1; IR (ATR): 3337, 3264, 2953, 2866, 1586, 1490, 1469, 1448, 1384, 1181, 1057, 1005, 903, 743 (s), 695 (s),
639 cm-1; Anal. Calcd. for C18H23NO: C, 80.26; H, 8.61; N, 5.20. Found: C, 80.36; H, 8.82; N, 5.15.
13. The submitters report that the amount of 2 present in the crude product can be determined by 1H NMR (400 MHz) analysis using methyl
cinnamate as an external standard and using the CH resonances of methyl cinnamate (6.44 ppm) and 2 (3.98 ppm). Sample preparation: a mixture of the
crude 2 (15 mg) and methyl cinnamate (8 mg) is dissolved in CDCl3 (0.6 mL). Biphenyl (3-6%) is typically observed as the by-product
(GC-MS). This does not affect the reaction in the next step.
14. The checkers used the following reagents and solvents in step B: L-proline (Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., >99.0%), di-tert-butyl
dicarbonate (Boc2O, Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., >97%), ethyl chloroformate (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., >95%), anhydrous
CH2Cl2 (Kanto Chemical Co., Inc., dehydrated, >99.5%), which was purified under argon by solvent purifying unit (Wako Pure
Chemical Industries, Ltd.), CH2Cl2 (Nacalai Tesque, Inc., 99.5%), MeOH (Nacalai Tesque, Inc., 99.8%), 35% HCl (Koso Chem.). The
submitters used the following reagents and solvents in step B: L-proline (BioChemica AppliChem, 99%), di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (Boc2O,
Acros, 97%), ethyl chloroformate (Acros, 99%, AcroSeal®), anhydrous CH2Cl2 (Acros, 99.8%, extra dry over molecular sieves,
stabilized, AcroSeal®), CH2Cl2 (Acros, 99.8%), MeOH (VWR BDH Prolabo, 99.9%), 37% HCl (BASF).
15. Prior to the transfer by syringe, Boc2O is melted by warming the container in a warm-water bath (35-40 °C).
16. Triethylamine (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.5%) was freshly distilled under an argon atmosphere from CaH2 prior to use.
17. The checkers monitored the progress of the reaction with4 the following analytical conditions: TLC on silica gel with 1:9 MeOH/CH2Cl2 as eluent and visualization with phosphomolybdic acid. The starting material and product have the following Rf values: 2 (0.60); 4 (0.70) on Merck TLC Plate 60 F254.
18. The addition of 12M HCl by pipette is slightly exothermic. The flask turns warm and fumes are evolved.
19. The reaction progress can be monitored by TLC; the checkers used the following analytical conditions: An aliquot (ca. 0.02 mL) was quenched by addition
to 1 M NaOH (0.5 mL) and EtOAc (0.5 mL). The EtOAc layer was analyzed by TLC on silica gel with 1:9 MeOH/CH2Cl2 as eluent and
visualization with phosphomolybdic acid. The starting material and product have the following Rf values: 4 (0.63); 5 (0.19)
on Merck TLC Plate 60 F254.
20. Since 5 is sparingly soluble in EtOAc, the conversion of 5•HCl to 5 proceeded via a slurry-to-slurry transformation.
After the extraction process, 5 has a solubility in EtOAc of ca. 1 g/40 mL.
21. The submitters noted a yellow to yellow-brown solution might be obtained if a lower grade of MeOH and CH2Cl2 were used for
the deprotection step. In that case, it is advisable to filter the solution through a pad of silica (5 g) in a sintered glass funnel using EtOAc (200 mL)
to rinse the filter cake. This serves to remove the base-line impurities prior to recrystallization in order to obtain an optimal yield of the pure
product.
22. The pressure should be lowered gradually in order to prevent bumping as a precipitate of 5 is formed during the concentration.
23. The submitters recorded an alternative procedure: The filtered EtOAc solution is concentrated by rotary evaporation (40 °C, 150 mmHg) to a volume
of ca. 250 mL, to give an off-white slurry of the crude product. The slurry is then heated at reflux for dissolution of the solid and left at room
temperature for crystallization.
24. The submitters observed the formation of side products upon long reflux of 5 in EtOAc. However, the recrystallization of 5 from EtOAc
provided the best crystalline 5 compared to recrystallization from other solvents (e.g. MeOH, EtOH, CH2Cl2, MTBE).
25. (S)-N-[(S)-1-Hydroxy-4-methyl-1,1-diphenylpentan-2-yl]pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (5) is obtained as a single isomer (by 1H and 13C NMR) and has the following physical and spectroscopic properties: mp 197-199 °C; [a]D20
-51.6 (c 1.00, CHCl3) lit.3a: [a]D25 -46 (c 1.2, CHCl3)]; 1H NMR pdf(CDCl 3, 600 MHz) d: 0.86 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H), 0.91 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3 H), 1.19-1.25 (m, 2 H), 1.42-1.49 (m, 2 H),
1.54-1.59 (m, 3 H), 1.86-1.92 (m, 2 H), 2.56 (dt, J = 10.0, 6.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.82 (dt, J = 9.9, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.48 (dd, J =
9.3, 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.58 (t, J = 9.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.45 (br. s, 1 H), 7.12 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.18 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.24 (t,J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.55 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4 H), 7.94 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H); 13C NMR pdf(CDCl 3, 150 MHz) d: 21.5, 23.8, 25.3, 25.7, 30.4, 37.5, 46.9, 56.5, 60.2, 80.8, 125.6, 125.7, 126.3, 126.5, 127.8, 128.1, 145.1, 146.5, 175.9; IR
(ATR): 3466, 3275, 3069, 2955, 2868, 1634, 1513, 1494, 1446, 1100, 1060, 885, 744 (s), 700 (s), 640 cm-1; Anal. Calcd for C23H30N2O2: C, 75.37; H, 8.25; N, 7.64. Found: C, 75.55; H, 7.98; N, 7.74. The checkers established the enantiomeric purity of 5 thus obtained by conversion into (+)- and (–)-MTPA amides10 Several sets of diagnostic peaks are observed without cross-over,
proving the enantiomeric purity of the final product 5. [MTPA amide derived from (+)-MTPACl: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz) d: 0.90
(d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H, (CH3)2CH-)), 1.07 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3 H, (CH3)2CH-)), 3.60 (s, 3
H, CH3O-); MTPA amide derived from (–)-MTPACl: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz) d: 0.89 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H, (C H3)2CH-)), 0.98 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3 H, (CH3)2CH-)), 3.70 (s, 3H, CH3O-).
26. The submitters reported that concentration of the mother liquors and recrystallization from EtOAc (100 mL) afforded an additional 2 g (11%) of 5
of slightly lower purity (1H NMR).